Convincing decision-makers to spend more money on analysis can be critical to completing a project successfully.

How to Convince Decision-Makers in Environmental Science to Spend More Money on Analysis

If you own a geoscience firm, chances are you didn’t get into this line of work just for the paycheck. You’re probably here because you care about the work—you enjoy solving difficult environmental problems, being outside, working with data, and, most of all, making a meaningful impact. Your projects help clean up polluted sites, reduce future risk, and shape better decision-making for clients. That’s real value.

But that value isn’t always easy to communicate when your client is staring at another cost estimate for additional analysis. You might be confident that running another survey or drilling another well is necessary to solve the problem, but your clients may be thinking: “What’s the point? Isn’t what we have already enough?” Here’s the truth: If you believe more analysis is needed to do the job right, then it’s your responsibility to help decision-makers understand why.

Everyone Wins From Deeper Analysis

When your clients invest in solving problems the right way, everyone wins. That’s why, we can’t emphasize this next part enough—the reason you should persuade decision-makers to increase their budget for analysis comes down to this: you want to do good work to solve your client’s challenges. You want to fix the problem thoroughly and accurately, and when a client agrees to spend more, it’s a sign that they also see the value in solving the problem accurately and thoroughly.

Spending money on better analysis isn’t just a box to check. It’s an opportunity to get a clearer picture of what’s happening underground and above ground. And that data drives better solutions. Whether it’s identifying contaminant flow, understanding subsurface hydrology, or modeling potential risks, having better information up front helps avoid expensive surprises later.

Ultimately, when your client agrees to fund deeper analysis, they’re not just funding more work—they’re funding better results. That’s worth advocating for.

The Biggest Hesitation to Spending More on Analysis

Despite the importance of advocating for deeper analysis, this can still be a tough conversation. Why? Because unlike tools or technology that promise visible ROI, analysis often doesn’t come with a shiny deliverable. You’re often asking decision-makers to invest in reducing risk or improving efficiency, which can be hard to quantify in the moment.

Your client might be saying, “This isn’t money that makes me money,” because you’re trying to sell the idea that spending more now will either reduce their future costs or help them avoid mistakes. That kind of value can be tough to explain, especially when the future benefit feels uncertain or far off. That’s why it’s crucial to reframe the conversation. 

Help your client understand what it will cost them not to do the additional analysis. If you’re certain that better data will reduce the risk of failure, overspending, or regulatory penalties, show them exactly how. What are the long-term implications of skipping the deeper analysis? What’s the financial downside of guessing instead of knowing? Once your client understands the risks they’re avoiding—and the costs they’re controlling—they’ll be more likely to approve the budget increase you’re asking for.

How an Industry Affects Willingness to Spend

Of course, the type of client you’re working with plays a huge role in how easy (or difficult) this conversation will be. 

If you’re working with a company in resource exploration, you’ve got an easier sell. These industries are naturally driven by resource estimation and production value. In their minds, every dollar spent on more precise data can lead to millions in future revenue. It’s a traditional investment mindset—and that makes your job easier.

But maybe you’re working with decision-makers whose motivation is regulatory compliance. That’s a tougher hill to climb. These clients aren’t necessarily looking to optimize outcomes—they’re just trying to submit the form, check the box, and move on. For them, upselling might be a lost cause. Unless, that is, you can reposition the project. 

If there’s a legitimate environmental or financial risk at play, and the analysis you’re recommending can help reduce future liability or avoid costly mistakes, then you’ve got something to work with. But you still have to help them move from “I just need this form done” to “I’m getting real value from this investment.” In this case, it’s all about showing how additional analysis serves more than just a bureaucratic requirement—it protects their assets, improves their outcomes, and keeps them out of trouble down the road.

Convincing Clients to Say Yes—In Any Industry

Here’s your best strategy, regardless of the client or their industry: spend a little time putting yourself in their shoes. Ask yourself: What does this client really want to accomplish? What outcome are they hoping for? And how can the services you provide—especially more in-depth analysis—help them get there?

Once you’re clear on their goals, show them how your recommendations support those goals. Don’t just say, “We need to do more analysis.” Say, “Doing this extra analysis will reduce the chance of costly rework by 40%” or “This survey gives us the data we need to keep the project on track and within budget.” Your client might not naturally make the connection between data and results. That’s your job—and the more clearly you can show the link between your work and their success, the more likely they’ll be to say yes.

Getting your clients to spend more money on analysis requires putting yourself in their shoes.

From Pushback to Partnership: Closing the Gap

Convincing a client to spend more money on analysis isn’t about upselling for the sake of it. It’s about helping them make informed, confident decisions that lead to better outcomes, whether that’s reduced risk, lower long-term costs, or a more efficient remediation strategy.

You’re not just a consultant. You’re a problem solver. So if you see a better path forward, speak up. Explain the value. Show them what they stand to gain or lose. And when your client realizes that spending more on analysis is actually the smartest decision they can make, they’ll thank you for it—because in the end, solving the problem right is always worth the investment.

Want more stories like this? Subscribe to our blog to receive a weekly update with the latest advice, stories, and highlights relating to geoscience! 

Share this post